DrewZ
TVWBB Fan
Not to be a wise *** but a one inch larger wheel will raise your grill 1/2”. Not a full inch.
That's correct for wheels mounted on axles, but not so much for casters.
Not to be a wise *** but a one inch larger wheel will raise your grill 1/2”. Not a full inch.
Ur right!No, it's definitely going to me more like 1".
There's (for easy math) a 1/2" gap between the top of the wheel and the base of the caster. So for a 4" wheel, the distance from the bottom of he wheel to the caster base is 4.5"
For a 5" wheel , the "arm" of the caster is about 1/2" longer, to maintain the 1/2" gap between the wheel and the case of the caster. So for a 5" wheel, the distance from the bottom of he wheel to the caster base is 5.5"
Look at this page, and look at the 4th column for "MOUNT HT.". The difference between a 4" and 5" caster is an inch.
McMaster-Carr
McMaster-Carr is the complete source for your plant with over 595,000 products. 98% of products ordered ship from stock and deliver same or next day.www.mcmaster.com
I understand the locking wheel, that is why I mention. The difference I was pointing out is that the standard stock wheels, on mine at least, roll so poorly that there is little worry of runaway.the offset is fine. I was worried about the extra torsion or shear from the longer or higher dimension. But that may be overshadowed by the lower force on small bumps...I had the same initial concern, but am comfortable with the retrofit. In my engineering judgement, the main stress is due to the horizontal offset distance between the stem and wheel axle, which puts a bending stress on the leg and insert. In this case, that offset is about the same as the OEM, approx 1”. I am certain the frame is up to the task by design. If the plastic inserts ever give out, I’ll replace them or figure out a better way to mount them, but so far so good. And, the new casters reduce the momentary stress when rolling over rough surfaces.
BTW, the installed brakes prevent it from rolling, i.e. locking the wheel.
Yep, agree. The additional height does introduce a bit more stress. There is slightly more horizontal flex ( I.e if you push the grill side-to-side with the wheels locked), but it is barely perceptible. And I believe as you say, outweighed by the benefit of better rolling. As mentioned, though, as a mild suggestion, I wouldn't go with much greater than 4" wheels.I understand the locking wheel, that is why I mention. The difference I was pointing out is that the standard stock wheels, on mine at least, roll so poorly that there is little worry of runaway.the offset is fine. I was worried about the extra tirsion ir shear from the longer or higher dimension. But that may be overshadowed by the lower force on small bumps...
Thinking the same thing Bruce. My E320 is a NG grill so it's on a pretty short leash I only move it a couple of feet to clean the mat it sits on, but the added height would be worth it.Those you posted are 5" wheels. That is going to raise you grill several inches....which is probably a good thing, IMO.
Got everything from these guys.Tim, where did you buy the parts?
I do not know. Bump. Can you post a picture of your current wheel?do you know if summit 670 would use same wheels?
I ordered these casters from Algood Caster Innovations in Toronto, for my Summit Platinum, I don’t need brakes as 99% of my cooking is on turf, their options are endless, color, size, bearings etc. $12. Each shipping included.