Rusty James
TVWBB Emerald Member
Hi all,
Today, I smoked a 7.5 pound turkey breast (about a three-hour cook), and then I smoked some sausages, hot dogs, and sausage patties (another hour or so cook). I filled the ring of my 18" WSM with a new 15 pound bag of Kingsford charcoal and poured the remainder in the bag (which wasn't that much) into a five gallon bucket.
Frankly, I was a bit shocked at the amount of coals it took to fill the ring. Out of 15 pounds, there must have been three or four pounds left? - maybe more. After I extinguished the flame, I dumped the used coals onto a large sieve I made, and I probably salvaged a couple of pounds of usable coals.
I hate to sound petty, but is charcoal usage an issue here with some people? Granted, charcoal can be found on sale quite cheap at times, but with winter approaching, the sales may dry up until next spring. I really enjoy my Weber smoker, but I may be forced to smoke everything at once at 10 pounds a smoke. I can't imagine the amount of coals it would take to power a 22" smoker!
I used to own a 22" kettle grill, but returned it to Lowe's near the end of 90 days because it took too much charcoal in my opinion to get any appreciable amount of grilling heat. I found an 18" Weber kettle at Home Depot for $31.00, and it has worked nicely for my purposes without the need for large sums of charcoal. However, I do think the 22" grill was great for smoking, and I miss it in that regard.
I've been entertaining thoughts of returning my 18" smoker for the 14" model, or either finding a cheap Smoky Joe and making it into a mini-smoker.
Do any of you have ways of using less charcoal per smoke? Would a smaller ring be a good idea for the food items I described above?
Thanks for reading.
Today, I smoked a 7.5 pound turkey breast (about a three-hour cook), and then I smoked some sausages, hot dogs, and sausage patties (another hour or so cook). I filled the ring of my 18" WSM with a new 15 pound bag of Kingsford charcoal and poured the remainder in the bag (which wasn't that much) into a five gallon bucket.
Frankly, I was a bit shocked at the amount of coals it took to fill the ring. Out of 15 pounds, there must have been three or four pounds left? - maybe more. After I extinguished the flame, I dumped the used coals onto a large sieve I made, and I probably salvaged a couple of pounds of usable coals.
I hate to sound petty, but is charcoal usage an issue here with some people? Granted, charcoal can be found on sale quite cheap at times, but with winter approaching, the sales may dry up until next spring. I really enjoy my Weber smoker, but I may be forced to smoke everything at once at 10 pounds a smoke. I can't imagine the amount of coals it would take to power a 22" smoker!
I used to own a 22" kettle grill, but returned it to Lowe's near the end of 90 days because it took too much charcoal in my opinion to get any appreciable amount of grilling heat. I found an 18" Weber kettle at Home Depot for $31.00, and it has worked nicely for my purposes without the need for large sums of charcoal. However, I do think the 22" grill was great for smoking, and I miss it in that regard.
I've been entertaining thoughts of returning my 18" smoker for the 14" model, or either finding a cheap Smoky Joe and making it into a mini-smoker.
Do any of you have ways of using less charcoal per smoke? Would a smaller ring be a good idea for the food items I described above?
Thanks for reading.