With the discounts that were going on, I ended up paying about $60 more for the new grill than I did the old in unadjusted dollars. The e410 was on sale for $560 and the Silver was right at $500 if I remember correctly.
I had no issues with the Silver. I'd upgraded the flavorizer bars to nice stainless a few years back, replaced the igniter a few times and the regulator once. The grates were getting close to needing replacement, and the where the grease tray connected to the firebox had cracked. Our family had grown as well, so I started looking at 4 burner Summits to refurb, but they were expensive and prone to rust, and the new ones were on closeout - so easy decision.
I'm not a fan of Weber outsourcing to China, but given the dynamics of the market today, it's hard to fault them. Large retailers like Walmart, Amazon and Home Depot own the customer, and the customer responds to price (just like I do). Most will look at "5 burner, stainless steel, infrared blah blah blah" Nextgrill for $199 that will rust out in 12 months and think it's a much better deal than a Weber Spirit for $300 that will last a decade or more. Same with the charcoal grills. The Kettle for $99 will last 10 times longer than the cheap grills for half the price, but I"m sure they sell a lot more of the cheap ones.
![]()
Still doesn't make it right and still won't make me part with hard earned $$$$ for anything they make any more. IMO they're no better than any other importer. And I think that there are better ways to spend the money
I agree Jon. It's a good looking grill. My brothers is the version with the stainless hood. I like the enamel hood better.
A stainless cart would be nice. But IMO the genesis II cart looks stout and similar to the old genesis grills carts that also weren't stainless but have lasted very well.
If a guy lived in a coastal state such as Florida or Alabama or Louisiana or California or the East coast, how far inland would you want to live to not have to deal with the "coastal salt air environment"?
Broil King would be appealing. But, I don't think their grills are better or even as good as comparable new Webers. The rest, to me, aren't even close. So comparing profit-oriented, non-family owned companies and their respective offerings I don't see Weber as any worse of a company than the others. And, I still find that their grills seem better than the competition at that level.
At least on a comparable level they're only about 1/2 the price of Weber. BTW I am not basing my judgement against them on how they "burned" me with the Summit. Simply on them being imposters. Maybe there is a better word for it but it's how I feel about them. Not saying I would not by an over seas made grill, just that I would spend my $$$ more wisely than parting with nearly $1000 for not much of a step up over another $400 import. They're NOT that good. I have looked at them side by side and I don't see the value anymore I really don't.
$800 today would have been worth about $475 in 1995. I don't know what a basic Silver B cost back then, but I am guessing, it was in that price range.
Sam,
I think that it is for sure that the Weber name still carries a lot more clout in the resale market. I am just trying to think through about Larry’s contention that Weber is now completely riding on its past reputation when in fact their grills are now no better than similar competitors and, if anything, overpriced. I believe, at least, that is a fair summary of what he has said.
Thinking as a buyer rather than a restorer, my feeling is that Webers are still better than their similarly-marketed competitors. The two grills I posted I believe give a clear and fair comparison at least between identically priced, similar offerings from both Weber and Broil King.
What is your take if you had to choose one of them for your own use?