Ruth’s Chris Steak House get $20MILLION in small-business aid.


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You can thank a bunch of the big banks who already had relationships with these larger firms. A lot easier to process on application for $20 mil. that a boatload of applications from those who really need the help. One wonders how much of indebtedness Ruth Criss already had with a lender. Also, how a chain that big gets under the 500 person cap.
 
Luckily the big corporations were saved first. Seems like there should've been some oversight over the program - I have been assured though that the fund would be refilled quickly, so no need to concern ourselves.
 
You can thank a bunch of the big banks who already had relationships with these larger firms. A lot easier to process on application for $20 mil. that a boatload of applications from those who really need the help. One wonders how much of indebtedness Ruth Criss already had with a lender. Also, how a chain that big gets under the 500 person cap.
I think the article said that somehow the large chains got the language changed to "no more than 500 employees at one location"
 
Just listened to a food podcast in which Tom Colicchio of Top Chef says he helped organize restaurant interests that hired a Washington lobbyist to get this provision inserted in the PPP legislation. Big restaurant groups with 20 restaurants and 2,000 employees can apply for loans for individual restaurants with no more than 500 employees.
 
Just listened to a food podcast in which Tom Colicchio of Top Chef says he helped organize restaurant interests that hired a Washington lobbyist to get this provision inserted in the PPP legislation. Big restaurant groups with 20 restaurants and 2,000 employees can apply for loans for individual restaurants with no more than 500 employees.
Makes me feel that much better about drastically overtipping on last night's carryout from a local, non-chain restaurant.
 
Isn't it the purpose of this to help restaurant workers ? Or was this just small business in general ?

I really don't have a dog in this fight, I just want to see restaurant workers get help no matter who they work for. Their industry is maybe the hardest hit and will have a really difficult time coming back.

Here's what's happening in China and they're still struggling, and these stringent measures would never go over here

 
Related to restaurants getting hammered, I watched this brisket class yesterday by Matt Pittman of Meat Church. At the end, he said " home cooking " was booming, his seasoning business was very good. He'd gotten calls from two C&W musicians from Nashville wanting barbecue advise. Traeger is very busy. Backyard barbecue is doing well at the restaurant worker's expense.

 
In "normal" we would probably get takeout about 1 or 2 times a week from wherever. Now we are getting takeout about 3 times a week from local mom and pop restaurants because we want them to be around when this mess winds down. Places we don't normally tip for takeout are getting heavy tips now. We want to support the little guy and their employees, not the big chains. These programs have run about as well as the stimulus program. Every day I log in and enter the 2019 tax numbers and our banking link only to get the figures don't match. Same with our 2018 numbers. One would figure since we get social security which is direct deposit that they would have the data they need. SSA just kicks you to IRS.
 
Landry's Restaurants, Houston based chain owned by Tillman Fertitta who owns the Houston Rockets, had to furlough 40,000 employees.

He's worth $4 billion . You'd think he could keep them on the payroll. Well, a month ago Landry's had $700,000 cash on the balance sheet and today its down to nothing. And most of his net worth is tied up in Rockets, who are valued at $2 billion . Hard to turn that into cash.

We have a breakfast chain that started here called Jimmys Egg. They have something like 35 locations around this region. And down the street from me is another small breakfast place called Sunnyside Diner, that has two locations. Both are really good. To me, I think the employees at Jimmy's Egg deserve as much help as those at Sunnyside Diner

I don't see the problem here. If it keeps restaurant workers from being laid off, then I'm good with it.
 
It's a tough call and I agree - at the end of the day, the front line workers for a big restaurant chain face the same responsibilities and obligations as those that work at an 8-stool diner.

However, the difference to me is the expectation/perception that a multi-location, multi-million (or billion) dollar restaurant chain would be better prepared and better equipped (both financially and in terms of personnel) to handle a situation like what we're seeing now.

Fertitta could probably find a few hundred grand in James Harden's beard. The NBA equivalent of shaking out the couch for loose change.;)
 
Last edited:
Just listened to a food podcast in which Tom Colicchio of Top Chef says he helped organize restaurant interests that hired a Washington lobbyist to get this provision inserted in the PPP legislation. Big restaurant groups with 20 restaurants and 2,000 employees can apply for loans for individual restaurants with no more than 500 employees.

I just found this article where Colicchio is complaining about PPP not helping small business :unsure:

https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2020/04/17/tom-colicchio-coronavirus-restaurants

If the president spent time looking at what PPP does and doesn’t do for small businesses, Colicchio thinks Trump’s tone would change. A specific plan regarding payroll and supporting small businesses would help the industry, he says.


Colicchio agrees that the industry will bounce back, but with the amount of help offered by the CARES Act and PPP, it could take 10 to 15 years — which isn’t good enough for him.

“I don't think he quite understands how devastating this has been to small businesses. We're going to see a lot of empty storefronts,” he says. “This will go on in every single small town across this country.”

Many restaurants remain open for takeout and delivery, but he says it’s not comparable to business as usual.
 
Fertitta could probably find a few hundred grand in James Harden's beard. The NBA equivalent of shaking out the couch for loose change.;)

Maybe not Harden's beard :)

But they're trying to shake it out of the debt market , $250 to 300 million to stay afloat, and pay 13% to 14% interest rate


We're about to get a clue on the health of the high-yield credit market...

Landry's Seafood is reportedly seeking to raise $250 million to $300 million in loans, according to CNBC's David Faber. The loan would serve as a "lifeline" for the business, Faber said. He added that Landry's offering would be the first significant debt raise in the high-yield market since the coronavirus crisis began.

The debt offering won't come cheap... Faber said the bonds could have an interest rate as high as 13% to 14%, up from a rate of 4.5% in February.
How this bond offering goes will be a huge key for the high-yield debt market.

As we've seen with the recent spike in credit spreads, issuing high yield debt has become more expensive. There's uncertainty over whether these companies will be able to pay back their debts because of the coronavirus.

And that's why we're seeing Landry's Seafoods take on an interest rate that's three times what it would've gotten just two months ago. It's desperate for the funds to keep operations intact, so it will take any interest rate it can get to get access to funding.

If the debt raise goes off without a hitch, it could inspire other high-yield companies in need of funds to do the same.

Expect investors to remain skeptical over high-yield debt as long as business operations are disrupted because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This will continue to make it more expensive for these companies to issue debt to get the funding they need.
 
In the podcast I mentioned with Colicchio, he said that ironically the smallest mom & pop restaurants, the ones run on a shoestring using family labor, are the ones most likely to hang on and come out the other side OK because they already run so lean. It's the large restaurant groups that will have the most difficulty restarting.

However, on something else I listened to, they said that PPP is one of the few lifelines small businesses have access to, unlike big corporations that have access to lines of credit and other options. That's why some are frustrated to see big companies swallow up so much money, leaving the smallest guys with no option at all.
These programs have run about as well as the stimulus program.
This becomes a political discussion, and we won't go there. What is clear is that PPP was intended by design to get money out FAST to small businesses, based on businesses making a simple declaration that they are negatively affected by the financial downturn. Almost like flying a crop duster filled with $350B across America's small businesses...you're gonna miss a few spots and over-apply in a few spots. :D

Isn't it the purpose of this to help restaurant workers ? Or was this just small business in general ?
Small businesses in general.
 
Glad to hear that Danny Meyer/Shake Shack backed out of their PPP loan.
APR 19, 2020 - AN IMPORTANT NOTE FROM OUR FOUNDER AND CEO

A letter from Danny Meyer and Randy Garutti —

On March 27, when both branches of Congress and the White House came to an agreement to provide sweeping financial assistance via the $2.2 trillion CARES Act, many of us in the restaurant industry cheered with a big sigh of relief. This pandemic, and the consequential shut-down of an entire industry that relies upon the gathering of people – at a moment when people cannot gather- had already shown that no restaurant is unsinkable. With slim margins in our industry to begin with, restaurants of all sizes and flavors were vulnerable and laying off people by the hundreds. Indeed, both Shake Shack and Union Square Hospitality Group needed to make those tough decisions too, furloughing or laying off hundreds of team members throughout our respective companies—one a publicly traded company, the other an independent restaurant group.

Restaurants function as the lifeblood of the U.S. economy and the nation’s spirit. The bulk of the over $800 billion that restaurant-goers spend on dining out flows right back into the economy with much of that impact going to the very small businesses this PPP loan was intended to reach. The CARES Act was touted as the largest economic stimulus package in U.S. history and on its initial face, for restaurants, there seemed to be a lot to like in the bill.

With the country facing a prospective permanent loss of restaurants up and down the food chain, the bill arrived just in the nick of time. The onus was placed on each business to figure out how, when, or even if to apply. The “PPP” came with no user manual and it was extremely confusing. Both Shake Shack (a company with 189 restaurants in the U.S., employing nearly 8,000 team members) and Union Square Hospitality Group (with over 2,000 employees) arrived at a similar conclusion. The best chance of keeping our teams working, off the unemployment line and hiring back our furloughed and laid off employees, would be to apply now and hope things would be clarified in time.

While the program was touted as relief for small businesses, we also learned it stipulated that any restaurant business – including restaurant chains – with no more than 500 employees per location would be eligible. We cheered that news, as it signaled that Congress had gotten the message that as both as an employer, and for the indispensable role we play in communities, restaurants needed to survive. There was no fine print, anywhere, that suggested: “Apply now, or we will run out of money by the time you finally get in line.”

Few, if any restaurants in America employ more than 500 people per location. That meant that Shake Shack – with roughly 45 employees per restaurant – could and should apply to protect as many of our employees’ jobs as possible. The immediate drop in business due to the virus had caused the company to face operating losses of over $1.5 million each week, simply by keeping our doors open with the goal of paying our people and feeding our communities. Our teams have been heroic, pivoting our business to a new curbside pickup and delivery model, while keeping our teams and guests at a safe distance.

For Union Square Hospitality Group, the decision as to whether or not to apply for PPP loans was more complicated. All USHG restaurants closed as of March 13th, and with no revenue, the company was forced to lay off over 2000 employees. Since the PPP loans would be forgivable only if employees were hired back by June, and since most USHG restaurants are based in New York City where that timeline is unlikely achievable for full service restaurants, that application decision relied upon our conviction that one day we would be able to pay back the loan. After careful consideration, USHG opted to apply for PPP loans, taking on the risk in order to hire back laid off employees as soon as possible. Some USHG loans have been funded, and we await the day we’re able to re-open.

Late last week, when it was announced that funding for the PPP had been exhausted, businesses across the country were understandably up in arms. If this act were written for small businesses, how is it possible that so many independent restaurants whose employees needed just as much help were unable to receive funding? We now know that the first phase of the PPP was underfunded, and many who need it most, haven’t gotten any assistance.

Shake Shack was fortunate last Friday to be able to access the additional capital we needed to ensure our long term stability through an equity transaction in the public markets. We’re thankful for that and we’ve decided to immediately return the entire $10 million PPP loan we received last week to the SBA so that those restaurants who need it most can get it now.

We urge Congress to ensure that all restaurants no matter their size have equal ability to get back on their feet and hire back their teams. We are an industry of 660,000 restaurants with nearly 16 million employees. While it is heartening to see that an additional $310 billion in PPP funding is about to be approved, in order to work for restaurants, this time we need to do it better.

• Fund it adequately. It’s inexcusable to leave restaurants out because no one told them to get in line by the time the funding dried up. That unfairly pits restaurants against restaurants. This industry rises and falls together. And if there is a concern that once again the government will have not allocated adequate funding, then send business to the front of the PPP line which has more limited access to outside funding.

• Assign to each applying restaurant a local bank that will be responsible for executing the loan assuming the restaurant has satisfied eligibility requirements. Too many restaurants have been left out of the program simply because they lacked a pre-existing banking or loan relationship.

• Eliminate the arbitrary June forgiveness date for PPP loans. This virus has moved in waves with a different timeline in different parts of our country. Instead, make all PPP loans forgivable if an adequate number of employees are rehired by a minimum 6 months following the date that a restaurant’s state (or city) has permitted a full reopening to the public.

If this health crisis and the associated economic shock has taught us anything, it is that we are all in this together. Restaurants and their employees are craving the moment when we can safely be back in business and bring our guests back to the table. With adequate funding and some necessary tweaks, the PPP program can provide the economic spark the entire industry needs to get back in business.
Shake Shack, like all restaurant businesses in America, is doing the best we can to navigate these challenging times. We don’t know what the future holds. Our people would benefit from a $10 million PPP loan but we’re fortunate to now have access to capital that others do not. Until every restaurant that needs it has had the same opportunity to receive assistance, we’re returning ours.

Danny Meyer is CEO Union Square Hospitality Group, Founder and Chairman of Shake Shack

Randy Garutti is CEO of Shake Shack
 
Well according to what I have seen written Ruth Chris is returning this money, so it looks like you have shamed them Jim well done. This for small bussiness first. <Edited by moderator>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

 

Back
Top