Geoff Parris
New member
ah, thank you. I really love OLED displays! Oh well
It would work, but the pins are on the wrong side of the display so it would be upside down and backwards. The interface is compatible but you'd need a ribbon cable or some other mechanism to attach it. HeaterMeter uses the 4-bit parallel interface.
For some reason, the pins across the top is the standard way to make them. I'm not sure how you're supposed to connect them in a commercial project where they don't take a tremendous amount of space. I can't have any components under the LCD, because if something's wrong and you need to get at them, removing the LCD is a real pain and something a novice would have a lot of trouble with.
I really can't fathom why that's the preferred mounting direction.
But... why would you need to? The position it is in now does not block access to any components so testing (and possible de-soldering of parts) is all possible with the LCD in place. I don't see any practical need to make it removable.I realize you're trying to keep the HM footprint as small as possible, but since the LCD is one of the more pricier parts in the project, maybe it should be be using a removable pin header design so that it can be removed/swapped/tested with ease from the main HM board.
But... why would you need to? The position it is in now does not block access to any components so testing (and possible de-soldering of parts) is all possible with the LCD in place. I don't see any practical need to make it removable.
As much as I like the 4.2 design, the LCD mounting procedure just rubs me the wrong way. I understand why it was done, I just think it could have been done more cleanly with 90 degree headers/sockets on both the board and the display. That being said, I'll still probably end up building one to go along with my 4.0 and 4.1
I have to disagree, I like the tight compact unit that is formed when the display is mounted so closely to the HM board, using any right angle header(s) and/or connectors would require more space and would make the resulting unit larger. That said, you have the option to put headers on your board(s) and use a ribbon or whatever to connect your display if you want, so I don't see an issue....
To me, the fact that the LCD prep/install has it's own wiki page signals that it's an overly complicated process.
I am building my first Heater Meter. I am done with the soldering of the main board components but have not attempted the thermocouple surface mount components yet. I have them, but can not find a picture showing what components go where. I have searched most of the forums and Bryan's wiki page but can not find an easy illustration and directions on this. Can anyone help me in this area? No problems yet as I am a noobie to soldering. Thanks!
First of all, it was probably a bad move to do the through hole components first, because soldering the SMD components is a bit tricky and is best done with the board sitting flat on a table, with all the other stuff soldered to the board already it's gonna be wobbly at best...
I think Bryan did a special wiki about the SMD soldering, but I am not sure, haven't used it myself. If you look at the board on the bottom side (opposite side where the rest of the component labels are found) you will see component values for all the SMD components. There is a dot on the SMD IC chip diagram to designate pin 1. Depending on your eyesight you may need a magnifying lense to see this clearly. I highly recomend you get a magnifying visor (Harbor Freight has one for like $3 bucks) that you can wear so your hands remain free to work...
I am building my first Heater Meter. I am done with the soldering of the main board components but have not attempted the thermocouple surface mount components yet. I have them, but can not find a picture showing what components go where. I have searched most of the forums and Bryan's wiki page but can not find an easy illustration and directions on this. Can anyone help me in this area? No problems yet as I am a noobie to soldering. Thanks!
You can use thermoworks instead of Mavericks.So how do we get a 4 port thermocouple support? I would prefer those probes vs the lousy mavericks. Anyone make a board for 4 yet? Let me know.
Thanks!
Neil
The HM board has only 1 thermocouple amp which can only support one thermocouple (as the pit probe). If you want additional thermocouples you would have to make your own amp circuit(s), one per probe...
IMHO you should only need one thermocouple, cause high heat is the only thing a regular probe can't do, and when you are cooking high heat you can not have ANY probes in the grill 'cause the leads on the probes (even the thermocouple) can't stand those high temps.
I do understand your frustration with failing Maverick probes, they take on water and die WAY too easily... but as John B suggested, try the ThermoWorks Pro thermistor probes, they are MUCH more resilient and water resistant than the Maverick probes, I have have had absolutely ZERO problems with their probes. I have used them on HMv4.0, v4.1, v4.2.3 and v4.2.4 and they work better for me than the Maverick probes (though others have said they have had problems, I have not, on any of my boards). I've had a Thermoworks Pro probe and my ThermoWorks Thermocouple out in the weather all summer long and they are both still working perfectly. If I had a maverick out there with them I am certain it would have died many deaths so far in the weather this year...