DanHoo
TVWBB Olympian
Steve,I don't even care about the sear burner but it appears to be standard now.
on the front control Genesis with the larger grates the sear burner is IMO a must-have or it just does not get hot enough.
I did a little math in the thread linked below and am copying it here since it seems relevant:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ excerpt from the post linked below ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
below are the grills that I own ( Genesis 1000, Silver B, E330 ) or often cook on ( E320, E310 )
BTU rating is from the tag on each grill.
Grate square inches is from literature on sales sites and is only the main cooking grate.
1998 1000 (side) | 2000 Silver B (side) | 2009 E320 (side) | 2016 E310 (front) | 2016 E330 (front) | |
square inch | 424 | 424 | 507 | 507 | 507 |
BTU | 35000 | 36000 | 42000 | 38000 | 48000 |
BTU/sqInch | 82.5 | 84.9 | 82.8 | 75.0 | 94.7 |
For the E330, the 94.7 number is misleading because it spreads 10K BTU from the sear burner across all square inches.
In terms of direct heat under the grate, the right side grate is 75.0 BTU/SqIn and the left side is 114 BTU/SqIn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
note: the newer 300 series have the sear burner on the righthand side, and I've read the sear burners are 12K BTU vs 10K
![tvwbb.com](https://tvwbb.com/android-chrome-192x192.png)
Weber Connect vs ThermoWorks
BTU is BTU. What is the difference if it came in the form of another burner wedged in between or 2 burners that could output more heat? All the el cheapo brands were flouting a "sear" burner. To the uneducated they see it as a huge "extra" at no cost. Weber HAD to tout a "sear" burner just like...
![tvwbb.com](https://tvwbb.com/favicon-32x32.png)