Butt vs. Brisket


 
Which cooks faster, Butt or Brisket?

I am talking about using a low and slow cooking method and about 225-250 degrees of heat for the entire cooking process.
 
If it is a thin brisket then, yes it can cook quicker. Thickness is key though, packers in the 12lb plus range that are quite thick can take as long as a butt per lb at lower than 250 vent temp if not using foil.
 
You also need to consider what's on which rack.

On my last butt/brisket cook, I put two big butts on the bottom, maybe about nine pounds each, and a thirteen or fourteen pound brisket on top. I cooked all night close to 250* at the vent, water in the pan, and surprisingly, all were done at about the same time and sooner than expected, just 12 hours later...no foil or turning/rotating. Obviously, the extra heat between the pan and the cooker's wall is what made the butts get done so fast.

Thankfully, butts are quite forgiving of the uneven cooking down there on the bottom rack, at least when I keep the cooking temp around 250 or lower. By contrast, as to temp/time, when I "spoke" chicken leg quarters on both racks but only have the bottom rack chicken over the water pan (not over the "hot zone"), the top rack chicken on average gets done first. As to the temp difference, on my last cook, a little oven gauge read 275* in the "hot zone" right next to the door when my therm in the vent was reading about 235*. This was in the first part of the cook, though, before the chicken had really started cooking good and the top rack was pretty full.
 
I usually cook brisket flats to about 190 -195 depending on the "tender-factor" and butts to around 200. Plus butts tend to be a little heavier than brisket flats, so that figures in.

Regarding Dave's top rack/bottom rack observations, I did a test a few years ago with temp probes and the bottom rack in the WSM ran 10-15 cooler than the top rack.
 

 

Back
Top