Hockey puck.......I get it....
How do you feel about the sous-vide portion of the steak, as in the texture in comparison to say cooking your steak indirect to about 110 and then heavy searing it?
I find there is a difference and am having a hard time wanting to use the sous-vide for my steak needs.......
Those do look real tasty however.
The texture for sous-vide is perfect every time for steak*, regardless of the cut. I sous-vide at 128.....pat dry, spray with avocado oil, S&P, then sear by flipping it frequently over the warp 10 heat for about a minute, or so. The difference to me isn't texture, it's the smoke. While both methods give a nice charcoal-grilled flavor, the reverse sear gives the meat more smoke, if that's what you want. I use your 110 temp/sear with the SnS, but always go easy on the wood, maybe a small piece of pecan or post oak, because a little smoke goes a long way on steak.
*I've never gone beyond 3 hours on my own steak because I think it would be mushy. Hers, I don't care because the well-done temp will tighten those fibers regardless of cook time. I mainly use this method for the convenience of having everything done at the same time because it's a weekday meal. For this cook, her steak went into the bath first at 160 for 1 hr, (1" thick filet), and I reset the temp for 128, scooped out some water, and dunked a gallon bag of ice cubes, with a small slit in the bag, until the temp dropped and then mine went for an hour so I could sear them at the same time.
The only meat, so far, that I don't like to sous-vide is pork chops. I did some thick loin chops a couple of times and the texture, and taste, was off-putting. Her 155 degree chop was tough....my 145 degree was almost slimy and they both tasted more like ham. This happened twice, so I won't be doing that anymore.