CaseT
TVWBB Platinum Member
Second cook, chicken wings. I really wanted to know how accurate the stock therm is. Well it isn't accurate. In my first test the stock therm was 20° over at temps lower than 200°, and 30° lower than the upper grate at temps above 200°.
This test it the stock therm was anywhere from 20°-30° under.
For this cook I ran the pit without the water pan. I was doing chicken wings I prefer a direct fire - indirect heat approach. I did not have the lower grate in so no temp comparison grate to grate without the water pan in. I placed one ambient probe of the iGrill2 at grate level. The other I put tip to tip (not touching) with the stock therm. Both iGrill probes read within 5°-10° of each other the entire time, and for a period were even Steven during the warm up. Final pit temp for the wings locked in at 350°. Phone battery died or I'd have had more photos.
Conclusion, if you are relying on your stock therm, don't. You need to get a unit that you can test regularly and preferably a remote therm that you can place where your food is cooking.
This test it the stock therm was anywhere from 20°-30° under.
For this cook I ran the pit without the water pan. I was doing chicken wings I prefer a direct fire - indirect heat approach. I did not have the lower grate in so no temp comparison grate to grate without the water pan in. I placed one ambient probe of the iGrill2 at grate level. The other I put tip to tip (not touching) with the stock therm. Both iGrill probes read within 5°-10° of each other the entire time, and for a period were even Steven during the warm up. Final pit temp for the wings locked in at 350°. Phone battery died or I'd have had more photos.
Conclusion, if you are relying on your stock therm, don't. You need to get a unit that you can test regularly and preferably a remote therm that you can place where your food is cooking.