Your charcoal is lying to you


 

Jason in CA

TVWBB All-Star
Do you know what kind of charcoal you're really using?

I'm not sure if anyone has come across this yet and posted or not. I read this and thought wow! How are they even getting away with this. Apparently some of them aren't.

 
whatever

snippets from the study: https://fpj.kglmeridian.com/view/journals/fpro/75/2/article-p164.xml

I highlighted a couple of items in bold red text


Material and Methods
Charcoal acquisition

Fifteen lump charcoal brands were selected for this study, representing the major companies operating in the North American charcoal market. Bags were purchased online between February and November 2019. As noted in more detail below, individual manufacturers are not named in this work, but manufacturer names were provided to the editors for review.

and like any research study it would be remiss if the recommendation did not include more studies be done. am I right ?

Conclusion
Our analysis reveals discrepancies between the claimed taxa, origin, and weight of lump charcoal sold in the US market and the actual composition of these products, which corroborates previous findings of misrepresentation in the US forest products supply chain and the EU charcoal trade. While this investigation provides a first snapshot-in-time for lump charcoal in the US market, further research would be valuable to assess if currently available lump charcoal still evinces such misrepresentations. Such research should ideally include expanding the scope of analysis to other charcoal products, especially charcoal briquettes, and investigating more deeply the complex issues surrounding charcoal production, consumption, and trans-national supply chains.
 
What figures?
Mike... How did your charcoal do ?
Mine... Not sure. NO DATA LISTED...
How do I trust their findings ?
Question I will.
Figures that Ole Miss would throw that out to the world with something like “anonymous” sources or unable to state the brands and varieties to protect the offenders. But…could be true too based on the odd looking stuff I’ve seen in premium lump I’ve used and I really have no idea what’s in the pressed charcoal or a way to scientifically verify. Always wonder about the pellets too, was it a horse glue holding them together or all the sweet gum trees cut around here squeezed in there with the Osage orange bodock thorn tree. Just wondering
 
Without names/brands, the studyfinds.org report isn't particularly useful, as it points a rather vague accusation at the entire US lump charcoal industry without supporting documentation.
So I don't know if the brands that I usually buy are being honest about the types of woods they use or not.
That makes the article pretty much not actionable on a personal level.

Like DanHoo, I often turn to the Naked Whiz's lump charcoal database for recommendations, however, that site is run by a gentleman who merely looks at physical characteristics and burn characteristics of the charcoals he evaluates.
Though I put faith in that database, I'm fairly certain the Whiz doesn't have the capabilities to determine the exact species of wood(s) and/or where they come from that are used to make the charcoal.

Without further real information, I consider this issue one akin to trying to boil the ocean, and I have far more solvable problems to consider.
 
That article popped up on my news feed and the first thing that jumped out at me was the study was conducted nine years ago. What good is their data today? But it does go to show that marketers are just as crooked as politicians!

Edited spelling.
 

 

Back
Top