• Enter the TVWB 27th Anniversary Prize Drawing for a chance to win a Weber Traveler Portable Gas Grill! Click here to enter!

Kingsford Pro charcoal at Costco


 
It burns faster and produces less ash.

Wrote these articles several years ago. Product name and packaging has changed, but info is still valid.


 
It was still on sale as of Thursday. I think it ends tomorrow. Not to worry as they'll probably have it on sale again in time for the Memorial Day Weekend...
 
Where I live, this was the first time I’ve seen Costco offer Kingsford briquettes… ever. Or any briquettes for that matter. $29 CDN over here for the 2 pack of Pro. Snagged one and have to say it works very well. Quite a bit of ash however. Not a big deal.
 
where do you live Bradley? I'm in Calgary and my Costco is now selling Kingsford Pro. Slightly more than the USD price (I paid $27 after exchange for two bags CAD in Montana and here they are $32) but still a great deal.
 
I tried a bag of the Kirkland charcoal last year and it worked just fine. I was going to get more, but when I went again, they were out of stock.
 
They had kirkland today. How is it compared to kingsford pro?
I'm in the "not fond of Kingsford Pro" camp; it's okay for burgers and hot dogs — stuff that cooks quickly — but for anything that takes longer it just doesn't last. For instance, I regularly cook chicken on the rotisserie, which takes a bit over an hour. The Kingsford starts to cool down before the chicken is cooked, forcing me to add more. PITA.

I much prefer the Kirkland. Burns longer, produces plenty of heat, but more ash. On that same chicken cook, the same amount of charcoal (two of the Weber baskets, on either side of the bird) easily makes it through the cook time at full heat without replenishment.

When doing long smokes in the WSK, I find Kingsford Pro to be next to useless. The Kirkland isn't as long-burning as, say, B&B, but it will get the job done for 4-6 hour cooks. I break out the B&B when I know I'm looking at 8-10 hours.
 
I'm in the "not fond of Kingsford Pro" camp; it's okay for burgers and hot dogs — stuff that cooks quickly — but for anything that takes longer it just doesn't last. For instance, I regularly cook chicken on the rotisserie, which takes a bit over an hour. The Kingsford starts to cool down before the chicken is cooked, forcing me to add more. PITA.

I much prefer the Kirkland. Burns longer, produces plenty of heat, but more ash. On that same chicken cook, the same amount of charcoal (two of the Weber baskets, on either side of the bird) easily makes it through the cook time at full heat without replenishment.

When doing long smokes in the WSK, I find Kingsford Pro to be next to useless. The Kirkland isn't as long-burning as, say, B&B, but it will get the job done for 4-6 hour cooks. I break out the B&B when I know I'm looking at 8-10 hours.
What are your thoughts on amount of smoke produced comparing KPro, Kirkland & B&B? I’m thinking particularly the initial unwanted smoke when it’s initially lighting up.
 
What are your thoughts on amount of smoke produced comparing KPro, Kirkland & B&B? I’m thinking particularly the initial unwanted smoke when it’s initially lighting up.

Chris did some prior analysis/comparisons on K Pro vs KBB and other charcoals. Links below.

Chris' conclusion is that:

It appears that Kingsford Competition Briquets light faster, burn hotter, produce less ash, and smell like wood when lighting as compared to “blue bag” Kingsford. However, it also burns faster than “blue bag” Kingsford in an uncontrolled situation as in a chimney starter.

I agree with Chris' take. Which is why I like K Pro a lot for my WSM. More wood char, less fillers, less ash.

K Pro is marketed towards oxygen controlled cookers -- like kamados or WSMs. Where it burns (imo) for a LONGER time and with less fire-snuffing ash than KBB. I always use K Pro for overnight WSM cooks.



 
What are your thoughts on amount of smoke produced comparing KPro, Kirkland & B&B? I’m thinking particularly the initial unwanted smoke when it’s initially lighting up.
I really don't pay a whole lot of attention to that; what I can tell you is that they're all a LOT less than Cowboy (aka Stubbs)!
 
What are your thoughts on amount of smoke produced comparing KPro, Kirkland & B&B? I’m thinking particularly the initial unwanted smoke when it’s initially lighting up.

Chris did some prior analysis/comparisons on K Pro vs KBB and other charcoals. Links below.

Chris' conclusion is that:

It appears that Kingsford Competition Briquets light faster, burn hotter, produce less ash, and smell like wood when lighting as compared to “blue bag” Kingsford. However, it also burns faster than “blue bag” Kingsford in an uncontrolled situation as in a chimney starter.

I agree with Chris' take. Which is why I like K Pro a lot for my WSM. More wood char, less fillers, less ash.

K Pro is marketed towards oxygen controlled cookers -- like kamados or WSMs. Where it burns (imo) for a LONGER time and with less fire-snuffing ash than KBB. I always use K Pro for overnight WSM cooks.




Good insights, Thanks. Looking at Chris’s comparison pics, it looks like B&B produces visibly less smoke. I didn’t see Kirkland in his research. I’ll have to pick up a bag of it.
 

 

Back
Top