WSM water pan ?


 
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Tim L.:
Dave, you mentioned "cleaning up the smoke", am I supposed to let the smoke wood burn for a bit prior to cooking? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

First of all, I'm not an advocate of preburning wood with the charcoal that you're lighting in the chimney. I find that when the wood is fully engulfed in flames that you'll get instant BAD smoke when put into the oxygen deprived environment of the wsm. In other words, if preburning wood in a chimney w/ charcoal, you need to burn all the way to coals. The thing is, that's about the same as lump, IMHO.

Now if you're asking about how I do it, I use the MM, and my ratio of lit to unlit depends on what I'm cooking and how fast I want to cook it. I bury the wood in the unlit with the tops of the chunks exposed to the lit that I'll pour on, unless it's a long cook. In that case, I'll have a couple exposed, and three or four buried completely. With the way I do it, the wood doesn't all ignite immediately, and there's not much time needed at all to get good thin smoke. As to the fuel, I think you need to give K blue smoke a little more time to clean up than other fuels, especially lump. If you're a fan of foiling during the cook, you'll probably want to get more smoke on the meat faster and might wonder what's my problem with a little heavy smoke at first. I find that with ribs, especially, less is more.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Tim L.:
Does anyone have a link for a clay saucer? Is there a real benefit to that over sand? Don't want to spend $$$ if I don't have to.

Dave, you mentioned "cleaning up the smoke", am I supposed to let the smoke wood burn for a bit prior to cooking?

Gracias senors </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

I don't have a link, but any garden shop should have the separate terra cota "saucers" that go under pots. Just be sure you get one that is not made in China -- avoid the possibility of it containing lead.

Dave can respond about "clean smoke", but the key is that the initial start up of charcoal and wood tends to generate a heave smoke. It will settle down in a few minutes to a good, clean, thin blue-ish smoke. That's what you're after. Heavy black or gray smoke is not good. White smoke often means steam.

Rich
 
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by RichPB (richlife):

Dave can respond about "clean smoke", but the key is that the initial start up of charcoal and wood tends to generate a heave smoke. It will settle down in a few minutes to a good, clean, thin blue-ish smoke. That's what you're after. Heavy black or gray smoke is not good. White smoke often means steam.

Rich </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Well said, Rich, and for the sake of clarity, the steam is only a factor when using water in the pan. I'm not so worried about getting blue smoke, but you can always be a man and get a whiff of the smoke to gauge if it's what you're after. If it immediately takes your breath away and makes you cry, it's not the kind of smoke I recommend. I'm looking for a thin wisp, but a little heavier smoke is fine if you're gonna foil.
 
Thanks Rich and Dave. What I generally do is toss the smoke wood on top of the already burning charcoal, let it burn for a minute or so, then toss in the meat. I haven't noticed any negative affects.

What I took from what you said was to let the charcoal, esp K blue, burn down a bit prior to adding food.

Any issues with my summary? Or with simply tossing smoke wood on top of coals?

Thanks
 
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Tim L.:
Thanks Rich and Dave. What I generally do is toss the smoke wood on top of the already burning charcoal, let it burn for a minute or so, then toss in the meat. I haven't noticed any negative affects.

What I took from what you said was to let the charcoal, esp K blue, burn down a bit prior to adding food.

Any issues with my summary? Or with simply tossing smoke wood on top of coals?

Thanks </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

If you like your method and results, stick with it. Lots of folks smoke like that. I wouldn't say you need to let K (or any other charcoal) "burn down a bit before adding food", though. You just want to make sure that it's burning cleanly, not burning as it was in the chimney. If you leave it in the chimney long enough, it'll start burning pretty clean, but I think you're waisting fuel at that point since you usually need to give the smoke from your wood a chance to clean up, anyway. Hope that makes sense, anyway, as I'm still trying to wake up. Looks like it's gonna be a two-cup-of-coffee morning.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Tim L.:
Thanks Rich and Dave. What I generally do is toss the smoke wood on top of the already burning charcoal, let it burn for a minute or so, then toss in the meat. I haven't noticed any negative affects.

What I took from what you said was to let the charcoal, esp K blue, burn down a bit prior to adding food.

Any issues with my summary? Or with simply tossing smoke wood on top of coals?

Thanks </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

No issues other than to let the charcoal "burn down a bit before adding food", whether in the chimney or in the cooker. I actually won't let my K burn as long in the chimney as I would for grilling. I want to get the heat in the cooker and get it going, and that's also time for the "smoke to clear".
 
icon_cool.gif
I like it SO much when I get to say something right.
icon_smile.gif


One other thing if you start looking at smoke (and smelling is a real good test -- just put your nostrils against the vent and inhale deeply... NO, NO, I'm just kidding
icon_eek.gif
). But what I REALLY was going to say is that in the cold weather we may be having now, the smoke is going to look heavier than at room temps.

And one item I read which is appropriate to summer cooks, said that if you can't see the smoke but can smell it, you have it right. If I smoke on my modified grill with gasket tape around the front and sides, the smoke is so diffuse coming out the back gap, that I often can't see it head on (from the front) but can just see it from the side (through the length of the gap).

Rich
 
Imho the water pan is there just to be able to use the lower cooking grate since so close to the heat. I never use the water pan at all when cooking low & slow on the top grate and have produced the best cooks over all. The only time i use the water pan empty & foiled is when cooking HH Brisket.
What i like about not using the pan.
1. Uses a lot less charcoal per cook.
2. Easier to adjust temps due to not having the water,saucer,sand or whatever heat sink u have to cool before temps fluctuate.
3. Easier to maintain a long steady burn once dialed in which takes about 30 mins max.
4. Easier to clean up after cook.
5. Never get burnt or over cooked edges, even cooking on meat.

No rite way or wrong way what ever work's for you keep doing it.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by RichPB (richlife):
icon_cool.gif
I like it SO much when I get to say something right.
icon_smile.gif


One other thing if you start looking at smoke (and smelling is a real good test -- just put your nostrils against the vent and inhale deeply... NO, NO, I'm just kidding
icon_eek.gif
). But what I REALLY was going to say is that in the cold weather we may be having now, the smoke is going to look heavier than at room temps.

And one item I read which is appropriate to summer cooks, said that if you can't see the smoke but can smell it, you have it right.

Rich </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Me too.
icon_biggrin.gif


...and I couldn't agree with you more, Rich, about the difference in the seasons. I've got a solitary 13.75 lb. packer on my little wsm right now, and even though I'm not using any water, the smoke sure looks like it. Even though the smoke looks a little heavier than I'd like, the oak smoke smells sweet, so I know it's good.
wsmsmile8gm.gif
 
Thanks again Dave and Rich.

I noticed from what you said Dave that you might do things differently depending on whether you're grilling or smoking. Grilling you might be apt to leave the charcoal in the chimney longer, "let it burn down more", before dumping and cooking (when would you add smoke wood for grilling then?).

Whereas with smoking, you leave the charcoal in less time because you want to start heating up the smoker. But, for smoking you use MM, so that means adding your coals to a pile of unlit charcoal and smoke wood.

Sound about right?

You mentioned brisket. I'm looking to do my first ever for the Superbowl. I'm cooking for a pretty forgiving family so I'm not overly nervous, but still a bit nervous since I've never attempted this before.
 
Well just found this.(Primo forum)

Well written and i can se some points in it.

Enjoy:

"I saw this discussion and I could not resist jumping in. I have been lurking for a few months but have not contributed in some time. Given that smoking food is a fairly straightforward process with only three main variables the issue of smoke, heat, and moisture are the focus of our attention as such they are subject to a great deal of mythology and folklore. A simple scientific review will assist in determining the "proper" or most efficient methodology to employ. Of course that being said this is barbecue and reason and science often take the backseat to instinct and tradition.

As we all know barbecue got its start in the cooking of the "lower" portions of the animals that were passed up by the more genteel folks in society( whom are said to live high on the hog). These were meats that were made up of muscles that were used regularly by the animal thus full of much connective tissues, large fibers, and generally very tough. But the first cook who discovered the basic proper methodology to these m eats was rewarded with the magical meal we call BBQ.

Some paleo-biologists posit that the first barbecue experience may have been a wandering tribe happening upon the carcass of an animal that had succumbed to a forest fire and that had been slowly roasted over the smoldering wood, sounds nice was probably delicious, but probably needed a good rub.

Now, the issue in this question was whether to use water or not? Scientifically speaking the answer is Yes. However there is a methodology and procedure that must be employed to gain the benefits of using water. It is already established that the best methodology for cooking tough and fibrous meats is braising, braising has commonly come to mean cooking under low heat in a high moisture environment. The purpose of braising is that a low, moist, long heat will break down the collagen in the meat, melting it thus internally basting the meat, tenderizing, and improving flavor in one fell swoop.

However, braising is a specific French technique in which a food is actually cooked under two different sorts of heat. The first generally being a high intense searing of the meat to encourage a Maillard reaction (or commonly mistakenly referred to as carmelization.) A Maillard reaction generally occurs when meat is heated above 310°F. Since the maillard reaction is a combination between the residual sugars and proteins found in red meat, and the smoking process helps to denature the proteins in the same meat, the smoking process and its low heat can be viewed to create a modified maillard reaction. Thus creating the bark we all seek.

I explain all of the above as it is the initial phase of what we are attempting to do which is a modified braise, instead of using high heat initially to stimulate the maillard reaction we are using a combination of low heat and smoke to do that. This modified first step will satisfy the first portion of the traditional braise. It is in the second portion of “the braise” the moist heat, that barbecue minds differ. I will not even address the concept of boiling your ribs prior and then dry smoking them (as a modified reverse braise method) as people who do that do not own Primos (I hope). Many people choose to foil their ribs in which they are simply “braising them” (cooking under low heat in a high moisture environment).

So when to use water? It is generally accepted that meats to be subjected to an intense smoking for one to one and a half hours prior to reaching an internal temperature of 150°, thus allowing the smoke to react with the proteins and denature the myoglobin, giving us the flavor and the smoke ring a that we all crave. After that generally speaking the smoke work is done, the low and slow method is in itself a modified braise as the low heat and the moisture in the meat will create an environment that will help to reduce collagen. However

This is where the water can help you do the heavy barbecue lifting; the idea is to have a water pan that has enough thermal mass to prevent heating to evaporative temperatures until the smoke has denatured the proteins in the meat. Once that occurs, let the moisture do its thing. Once the water reaches a temperature in which the water begins to evaporate it will then increase the moisture of the air passing over the meat and escaping out of the grill, this will give you a high moisture low, heat environment (braise). The benefit of having enough water to withstand the initial heating is that you will also have enough water to last throughout the entire cook (assuming cook time <6 hours) When done properly, this will negate the need to use the foil step when making ribs.

A standard large lasagna pan (4.5” x 12”x18”) filled ¾ of the way up will set on top of the D-plate racks, provide a heat shield and will provide enough moisture for a long cook (it will also catch all of the drippings) it will also clean easy as long as it is never cooked to dry. Lasagna pans are used, first because of its size and second because when cooking lasagna it must be subjected to baking temperatures therefore they are generally of more substance and provide more of a thermal barrier than tinfoil pans and they do not have handles like most roasting pans do.

So that brings us to the next question of what you should add? Water, just water, unless of course you plan on drinking or cooking with the remaining pig drippings, water/juice mixture that remains in the drip pan after the cook. Many people in the world of barbecue and on this website use apple juice, also cheap bourbon, beer and other sorts of juices have been suggested to add to the water. You might as well drink them because it will absolutely do nothing to your barbecue. Science tells us that when a solution is exposed to heat, the contents of the solution will vaporize and escape the solution based on their chemical volatility and boiling points. All juices and alcohols contain a similar chemical structure. Juices contain phenolic compounds that give them their particular flavor profiles, sugar and approximately 60 to 90% water. Whiskey and beer contain alcohol (which is chemically almost identical to phenols except that in alcohol the hydrogen and oxygen are bonded to a saturated carbon) sugar and about 50% to 90% water respectively.

Why is this important? Because many phenols are so volatile that they will evaporate in water as low as 40 to 50°F, and occur in small quantities thus rendering them ineffective to impart any beneficial flavor profiles, many other phenols are so chemically sound that a boil and upwards of 350° (well past the boiling point of water at 212°F) thus rendering them ineffective to part any flavor. Juices and alcohols are used in cooking however because the compounds in particular may be alcohol/phenol soluble, releasing new flavors and then the phenols/alcohols evaporate.

So even if the entire drip pan were filled with Apple juice, any volatile phenolic compounds would evaporate immediately or remain in the pan. The other ingredients of your drip pan would be water and fructose, glucose and maltose in varying amounts. Given that the sugars are solids dissolved in solution, once the water is boiled away the sugars will remain in the pan. So by boiling apple juice in drip pan, you will be creating perfectly distilled water vapor (if you're able to turn that vapor back into water (condense) it would be distilled water free of all impurities and any chemical compounds other than H2O would be left in the pan, thus the entire reason for distilled water and its particular applications)

So chemically and scientifically speaking the most efficient technique to use a drip pan would be to build a fire with a wood of your choice once you are sure it will not go out, place the D. plate racks on the grill, place your large lasagna pan on top of the racks and fill it ¾ of the way with ice water (mainly water as the only purpose of the ice is to make sure that water cold as possible) **

Then place the meat which you have rubbed and left in refrigerator uncovered overnight (the dry refrigerator dehydrates the surface of the meat allowing for better bark formation and facilitating the myogloben/smoke reaction we are looking for) for the first part of the process, dryer is better as it will enhance the retention of smoke flavor. Close the grill, set your vents bring it to your desired temperature and smoke as usual. As a guide, spareribs will cook in approximately 4 1/2 to 5 hours. (If conditions are ideal your ribs should then be stored covered in the refrigerator for 24 hours and then brought up the temperature on a very hot grill the next day. (Why? That's for another post))

I know many people will take exception with the above post (not just because of its length) but because anecdotal evidence and experience has led them to believe otherwise. But even though science may not recognize anecdotes and wive’s tales, invariably, when they are proven to be efficacious all anecdotes and wives tales are ultimately and finally grounded in science.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Tim L.:
Thanks again Dave and Rich.

I noticed from what you said Dave that you might do things differently depending on whether you're grilling or smoking. Grilling you might be apt to leave the charcoal in the chimney longer, "let it burn down more", before dumping and cooking (when would you add smoke wood for grilling then?).

Whereas with smoking, you leave the charcoal in less time because you want to start heating up the smoker. But, for smoking you use MM, so that means adding your coals to a pile of unlit charcoal and smoke wood.

Sound about right?

You mentioned brisket. I'm looking to do my first ever for the Superbowl. I'm cooking for a pretty forgiving family so I'm not overly nervous, but still a bit nervous since I've never attempted this before. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yeah, that's about the way I go. I like my briquettes to all be ashed over per K's instructions so I get nice even heat when grilling. If I use wood, after spreading the briquettes out I'll put just a chunk on the edge of the fire under the grate handle (opposite the side where I'll put the vent over.)

As to the brisket, as long as you cook til tender, but not falling apart like pork butt, it'll be fine. I'd suggest foiling once the IT of the flat gets into the 160's. It sure speeds things up and seems to help with moisture retention as well.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Wolgast:
Well just found this.(Primo forum)

Well written and i can se some points in it.

Enjoy:
...
</div></BLOCKQUOTE>

icon_eek.gif


Yeah, we all knew that, right?

But does it really change anything?
wsmsmile8gm.gif


Rich
 

 

Back
Top