Hi All,
Just did two test burn-ins with my new "fauxmodo" (credit to Ralph for that) Akorn using one of my HM 4.2.4 with TC support. The TC amp and components were suppplied on-board from Bryan.
I used a Auber K-Type TC and 3 x ThermoWorks TX-1001X ChefAlarm Pro Probes.
I experienced *significant* variances in the temperatures between all of the probes despite them being grouped together within centimeters. The three ThermoWorks were tightly packed sitting in the same mount with all three of their ends lined up with the TC about 2 centimeters away.
They were all in the center of the grill, over a water pan sitting on a diffuser / pizza stone.
Graphs here:
Burn Test 1
Burn Test 2
CSV for both sessions here:
http://http://www.alteredchord/BBQ/TCProblems.csv
Does anyone have any thoughts on why the variances would be so significant?
The inability for the HM to control the Akorn is a whole other ball of wax that Ralph is helping me sort through. Looks like a lot of silicone is in order.
Thanks!
Phillip
Just did two test burn-ins with my new "fauxmodo" (credit to Ralph for that) Akorn using one of my HM 4.2.4 with TC support. The TC amp and components were suppplied on-board from Bryan.
I used a Auber K-Type TC and 3 x ThermoWorks TX-1001X ChefAlarm Pro Probes.
I experienced *significant* variances in the temperatures between all of the probes despite them being grouped together within centimeters. The three ThermoWorks were tightly packed sitting in the same mount with all three of their ends lined up with the TC about 2 centimeters away.
They were all in the center of the grill, over a water pan sitting on a diffuser / pizza stone.
Graphs here:
Burn Test 1

Burn Test 2

CSV for both sessions here:
http://http://www.alteredchord/BBQ/TCProblems.csv
Does anyone have any thoughts on why the variances would be so significant?
The inability for the HM to control the Akorn is a whole other ball of wax that Ralph is helping me sort through. Looks like a lot of silicone is in order.
Thanks!
Phillip