<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Mike Hartwell:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">I have a new 18" WSM. I stuck my Taylor 5911N thermometer into the lid port to double check the temperature of the lid thermometer on the WSM and they are about 20-30 degrees off </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I took this to mean that he compared the results of both therms taken thru the OE port in the lid of his !8.5 WSM. Hence my comment about the inaccuracy of the OE therm as reported in many entries on this board. My intent was to point this apparent fact out to Jason.
Thanks. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I guess that was a second cup of coffee morning and I never got a second cup. If you change where he said "lid port" to "lid vent", you might get an idea why I wrote what I wrote in my first reply.
After all, THAT queastion has been posed many a time....but it doesn't change the fact that I was in left field from misreading a word.
No, Mike, to be honest, I'm not too fond of the OE gauge, either. As matter of fact, I had Weber send me another one, but it's about 15 degrees off. (My first one was w/in five, but not anymore.) Anyway, my point was that the gauges are fine "until proven guilty", but it sounds like the poster's is guilty as sin, huh? Funny that lots of folks seem to be happy w/ 'em, but I'll be at a loss when my ET-73 gives out.
Thanks for pointing out my misunderstanding.