Dan H.
TVWBB Pro
all my little theory's and notes on briskit that I so take the time to write and remember all end up blown out of the water, every time. TILL NOW! (evil laugh). wanted the board to share there thoughts w/ me on it. anyway i've cooked what I would call a lot of seperate briskit cooks since owning a wsm, cause its possibly my fav. smoked food. not to brag but everyone is always impressed (except my perfectionist self) with them it seems like. I've had from excellent, to good, to bad, to big accedents, and then some but 85% great meals w/ briskit. but i think i've discovered that the fat content is important for moistness/tenderness, which would make some since but not totally. I don't want anyone to waste there typing on things that have been discussed before or anything cause i've always watched "briskit" posts but darn.. that seems to be the key for me. I guess the maj. would say the tenderness level means done and fat side down, etc. etc. and I agree 100% but i've DONE that so much and im telling you I could do it in my sleep almost and not all of them have turned out 'great" but most. theres always those few and thinking back it was always the ones that have looked awfully red w/ hardly any fat, btw im talking about whole packers, always. i'll even be honest about foiling, I foil these days but i've not foiled before (never used to) and there both good methods and both (in my eyes) work equally, and well... what I mean is I don't see that ones better then the other in my cases. basicly im obsessed. just wanted your thoughts. It may turn out that this is a big "duh" and everyone already knows this, i don't know. It's just a challenging thing to cook, compared to some. and all this time I thought I was like "blessed" w/ beginner luck or something but I do turn out some embarrasing ones and couldn't figure out why, it should be like riding a bike once you've done like 10 or 15! guess not.