Indoor/Outdoor HDTV Antenna with Mast


 
I used something similar for DTV (and later, Dish Network) and it worked well for me. Of course, the more you use it, the better you get at using it. What really made a difference for satellite antenna aiming for me was a lensatic compass like this:

View attachment 108147

There may be something better or more appropriate for your needs out there, but this is what I used for finding potential obstructions. I remember one time in particular at Patrick's Point I swear I was shooting over the tops of the trees but any little breeze would cause me to lose signal. :mad:

View attachment 108149

Also, you could buy an antenna tripod (mine is a Radio Shack but probably NLA) and a decent length of pipe from a fencing store and change your antenna location to try to find a better spot.
I’m not overly thrilled with the chimney mount, I’m going to look into a different mount
 
I’ve yet been able to power up the signal amp, I need two short cables. I guess I need to take a drive into town and get the cables. I had 100’s of cables before I moved, they didn’t make the move and now I need them. Never fails
 
Chuck, at least you know you don't have the cable.

If I needed one I would presume I have one in my garage and then I'd probably spend an hour or two looking for it. I might find it or more likely I'd give up and end up driving into town to buy another one.
 
My iPhone compass app would go nuts when it was within 10-15' or so of the antenna and produce bogus results.

Ultimately I used it on the ground, aimed the iPhone, saw a target on the horizon, and aimed the antenna there by eye while on the roof.
 
My iPhone compass app would go nuts when it was within 10-15' or so of the antenna and produce bogus results.

Ultimately I used it on the ground, aimed the iPhone, saw a target on the horizon, and aimed the antenna there by eye while on the roof.
exactly. i aim when no antenna is nearby and then i tack down a blue masking tape strip in the direction i need to aim towards. then install the antenna and align it's face with the masking tape's direction. and then do any fine tuning while running live to the tv to confirm picture visual quality.
 
I’ve yet been able to power up the signal amp, I need two short cables. I guess I need to take a drive into town and get the cables. I had 100’s of cables before I moved, they didn’t make the move and now I need them. Never fails
ChuckO, please forgive me for asking if you already have the amp bypassed, but since you don't have power to the amp, have you been connected through the amp, or is your antenna lead to your single test TV connected directly to the antenna? For locating signals without power to the amp, I would start with a lead directly between the antenna and a single TV, no splitters, no amps, etc. Once you can get power to the amp, you can try reception with the amp in-line, but no splitters until you know how much signal you're getting. The signal loss through an un-powered amp can be pretty high.
 
ChuckO, please forgive me for asking if you already have the amp bypassed, but since you don't have power to the amp, have you been connected through the amp, or is your antenna lead to your single test TV connected directly to the antenna? For locating signals without power to the amp, I would start with a lead directly between the antenna and a single TV, no splitters, no amps, etc. Once you can get power to the amp, you can try reception with the amp in-line, but no splitters until you know how much signal you're getting. The signal loss through an un-powered amp can be pretty high.
I bypassed the amp entirely, the cable was straight from the antenna directly to the TV. I picked up the cables I needed, connected the amp to the antenna, connected the power module (the thing that looks like a splitter and has a low/high gain switch) I'm still aimed at 278 degrees (west) and I get nothing. Tried both high & low gain.....Nothing. There's two towers between 170 & 175, so I'll aim the antenna at 173 and see if I can get them. If not, my last resort is aiming at 214. If that doesn't work, I need to second guess my set up. Maybe if I go higher (add another 10' to the pole) try a different antenna location (not overly thrilled the the chimney strap set up) or.......Hopefully ya'll have some other suggestions.

Maybe a setup like this one about a mile from my house 👍🏻
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7400.jpeg
    IMG_7400.jpeg
    348.2 KB · Views: 11
Not trying to rain on your parade, but the next issue is going to be weather (bad pun). If it turns out that you are on the fringe of reception already, there is that.
 
Chuck,

I looked at a few of those DTV reception mapping sites that i know take the surrounding terrain into account, and entered your location information.

The first one is the official FCC DTV reception maps site, which states:

"These predictions are based on a terrain-sensitive propagation model resembling but not identical to the propagation model used when calculating service and interference contours for licensed broadcast television stations. Actual signal strength may vary based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, building construction, neighboring buildings and trees, weather, and specific reception hardware. Your signal strength may be significantly lower in extremely hilly areas."

That site uses a default 30ft antenna mounting height, and came up with only three stations that are in possible reception range (KRCR, an ABC affiliate, KIXE, a PBS affiliate, and KNVN, an NBC affiliate):

1740963886700.png

The other site is TVFool.com, which while uses data that is somewhat stale, seemed to agree with the FCC site.
I was able to specify an antenna height on the TVFool site, so initially I tried what I thought would be a more realistic 10 ft height - you can see those results here: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=29&q=id=b0fed827d332e0

With antennas, higher is very often better, so I tried some hypothetical what-if heights to see if I could get at least some of the stations to have a path of "line of sight" (LOS) rather than "single edge diffraction" (1Edge). At a 95 ft(!) antenna height, I was able to get the top three listed stations to be LOS. See those results here: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=29&q=id=b0fe8e4cfaa7fc . Not sure you'd want to attempt to mount an antenna on a tower that high though.
 
Chuck,

I looked at a few of those DTV reception mapping sites that i know take the surrounding terrain into account, and entered your location information.

The first one is the official FCC DTV reception maps site, which states:

"These predictions are based on a terrain-sensitive propagation model resembling but not identical to the propagation model used when calculating service and interference contours for licensed broadcast television stations. Actual signal strength may vary based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, building construction, neighboring buildings and trees, weather, and specific reception hardware. Your signal strength may be significantly lower in extremely hilly areas."

That site uses a default 30ft antenna mounting height, and came up with only three stations that are in possible reception range (KRCR, an ABC affiliate, KIXE, a PBS affiliate, and KNVN, an NBC affiliate):

View attachment 108263

The other site is TVFool.com, which while uses data that is somewhat stale, seemed to agree with the FCC site.
I was able to specify an antenna height on the TVFool site, so initially I tried what I thought would be a more realistic 10 ft height - you can see those results here: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=29&q=id=b0fed827d332e0

With antennas, higher is very often better, so I tried some hypothetical what-if heights to see if I could get at least some of the stations to have a path of "line of sight" (LOS) rather than "single edge diffraction" (1Edge). At a 95 ft(!) antenna height, I was able to get the top three listed stations to be LOS. See those results here: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=29&q=id=b0fe8e4cfaa7fc . Not sure you'd want to attempt to mount an antenna on a tower that high though.
Good info Keith, thanks! I'm coming to the conclusion that OTA TV might not be in my cards.

I'm going to move my antenna to the side of the house where I can best aim for 274 degrees using this mount, I'm not a fan of the chimney mount

I'm going to some additional "stackable" poles similar to this which I bought for free with my amazon points

That should put my antenna about 45' in the air. If that doesn't work, I'm probably going to abandon the project. I'll be $500+ into it, and that's my usual enough is enough dollar figure for projects trending toward failure. I'll package everything up and give it to my son, he's down in Discovery Bay and he has many towers available to aim at. He would probably get a kick out of it

It's not dead and stinking yet, but it does stink, LOL
 
Good info Keith, thanks! I'm coming to the conclusion that OTA TV might not be in my cards.

I'm going to move my antenna to the side of the house where I can best aim for 274 degrees using this mount, I'm not a fan of the chimney mount

I'm going to some additional "stackable" poles similar to this which I bought for free with my amazon points

That should put my antenna about 45' in the air. If that doesn't work, I'm probably going to abandon the project. I'll be $500+ into it, and that's my usual enough is enough dollar figure for projects trending toward failure. I'll package everything up and give it to my son, he's down in Discovery Bay and he has many towers available to aim at. He would probably get a kick out of it

It's not dead and stinking yet, but it does stink, LOL
Yeah, I was disappointed when I uncovered that OTA may not work for you, but I felt that I had to let you know before you got too much farther into the project.
Maybe getting some more height would help with the two strongest stations on those lists, but one can't say for sure.
While the antenna model you have has worked well for me, I don't have the terrain challenges that you have at your location.
My late father had a place in the Allegheny mountains of western Pennsylvania years ago, and he tried several things to get OTA, but had to settle for only two or three stations in the end.
That result was from a large antenna on a tall tower, and was years before DTV was a thing.
Believe it or not, but one thing he actually found that sort of worked was to have the antenna near the ground, but pointed in the direction of one of the stronger stations and up slope of the mountain in between his place and the transmitting antenna.
I think in that case, Dad's antenna was picking up a ground wave that had diffracted (bent) over the top of the mountain and traveled down the side opposite of the station's antenna. But that was only for one station, and reception was inconsistent.
 
Mounted my new antenna with rotator on my AC unit on the roof, big improvement over my old one, on the TV's channel search it would scan over 70 channels, with this new antenna I'm getting over 100, getting channels didn't realize were out there, very happy with this setup.
thumbnail (10).jpeg
 
Mounted my new antenna with rotator on my AC unit on the roof, big improvement over my old one, on the TV's channel search it would scan over 70 channels, with this new antenna I'm getting over 100, getting channels didn't realize were out there, very happy with this setup.
Nice set up John, I imagine you might be able to pick up the towers at Twin Cities Road @ Highway 5 (north of you) When we were kids, we used to climb those towers. The Sheriff got tired of telling us to not climb them, so he said "try not to hit too many rungs when you fall, we don't want a big mess for all to see." :)
 
I gave up and the setup needs a good home, see the for sale post here
 

 

Back
Top