Changes made to Weber grills


 

Joe Mac

New member
Forgive me if this issue/concern has been previously discussed and, perhaps, beaten to death, it has been a while since I was last here.

My concern is the changes made to the Genesis and, quite frankly, ALL Weber gas grills. Additionally, I am disturbed by changes to the corporate structure of the company. The company WAS privately held, then taken public, issuing stock and traded on one of the exchanges. It has since been taken private again, by a private equity company, as I understand it. If I am mistaken about this most recent move, forgive me and feel free to set me straight.

All these changes have resulted in some, what I believe to be, drastic changes to the product and the operation of this company.

At one time, we could get real, true, useful assistance from the customer service staff who operated the phones. Now, staff are, at least seemingly, somewhere in Asia and have little-to-no real-life understanding of the changes made to the grills, nor how they operate, beyond a basic click the igniter; heat the grill; put what’s to be grilled on the grates; and cook it to desired “doneness”.

Disappointed with this, I called the corporate offices in Illinois and left a message on some line. I was surprised and grateful to receive a callback the next day. That was the only thing that was “ pleasing” about that experience.

I made clear what I was hoping to achieve with my conversation and achieved absolutely nothing that I had hope for.

I made it clear that I had questions about why the orientation of the burners was changed from their former direction of side-to-side to their current front-to-back orientation. I wanted to know how the decision was arrived at, what the supposed advantages and benefits were. What drove this decision?It seems to me that this was a pretty major change and one that would not have been made without some thoughtful reasoning and, possibly, some discussion among, MAYBE, an engineer, or two.

My correspondent had no clue. He only knew that the burners, yes, ARE oriented in this direction. WHY? NO CLUE. I offered up my opinion on why this could be problematic when trying to rotisserie, say, a chicken. The burners, in the former orientation, were perfect for indirect heating, with the front and rear burners applying the heat, were directing their heat to the bulkiest part of the bird - its breasts, making for a damn good finished product, imho (and that, the opinion that is, of those whom I served the bird). I, stupidly continued this line of inquiry - again, why this was done? Still absolutely NO IDEA.

OKAY. On to, maybe something he might know (fingers crossed). Now this change may have been done years before this kid had begun working for the company. For a little background, my current Silver Genesis was made in 2001 and purchased in May of 2002. It is a natural gas model that still works like a champ. Over the years, I have casually looked at the models at HD and Lowes, without really looking too deeply at them, because mine works so weil. My only cause for considering a change is that, while the cookbox and burners are in EXCELLENT condition, the frame of its support structure is rusting out, in spite my good for it. I have looked for a new structure with no luck. I am willing to do a rebuild in order to preserve the grill, but it’s been difficult to find the frame.

I asked about the change from cast aluminum cookboxes to the current stainless steel. Again, crickets. This guy seemed to not even know that the cookbox was, virtually forever, constructed in that manner and that a change HAD occurred.

There are many other things, things that I believe we are all aware of, things that stem from smaller decisions to “cheapen” the product, from their being made overseas, to the simple inferior quality components now being used. Guess it’s simply a sign of the times and an old fart like me who remembers the “good old days” is aging out of the market. Those consumers now coming in to that market have no idea of what “ was” and now simply accepts what “is” because there’s nothing to which they can compare it

I am at the point at which I’m about to give in and give up and go to another manufacturer. It seems that the others also orient their burners in the same manner, and I am totally reluctant to move from the brand I have trusted for over 40 years, owning concurrently, both gas models and charcoal kettles and replacing various parts when they have outlived their usefulness.

The ONLY things I have had to replace on either models (save for two of the four kettles I have owned that just plum wore out; one of the kettle grills, my first, was replaced when I “graduated” from the 18” to the 22.5” model. I gifted the smaller one to my brother, who continued using it for about another 12 years.) were “flavorizer” bars and the grates). I received my first gas-burning Weber Genesis in 1987 as a gift from my father-in-law and replaced it in 2002.

I have “coached” others on THEIR purchase decisions over the years, always singing the praise of Webers, but I am quite sadly “done”, I am disappointed to say.

I simply cannot buy from someone who has abandoned its principles AND its loyal followers.

Anyone out there’s disappointed as I?

(Sorry for the length of this, but I figure we’re all pretty passionate about these grills, otherwise, we wouldn’t be here.)
 
First, thank you for taking the time to share such a heartfelt and detailed post. It’s clear that you care deeply about Weber products and the legacy they’ve had, not only in your household, but across generations. That kind of brand loyalty doesn’t come lightly, and it speaks volumes about the impact the company once had on consumers like you.

I’d like to gently offer a few thoughts. Not to dismiss your concerns, but to help put some of these changes into a broader context.

Regarding the customer service experience, I completely understand your frustration. Many companies, particularly those operating at scale, have shifted portions of their customer service overseas to manage costs and improve availability. While this often comes at the expense of nuanced product knowledge, it’s a common tradeoff in today’s global business environment.
That said, it’s great that someone from the Illinois office returned your call; unfortunately, even then, it’s not always realistic to expect front-line employees to provide detailed engineering rationale behind product decisions. Their training and role may not include that level of internal knowledge, and those kinds of decisions often involve a combination of factors like cost, manufacturing logistics, user data, regulatory compliance, and competitive benchmarking that aren’t readily available to staff who interact with customers day-to-day.

As for the changes in burner orientation, you raise a fair point about indirect cooking and rotisserie use. It’s true that side-to-side burner layouts were ideal for that style of cooking, and it’s possible that the move to front-to-back orientation was made to align with industry norms, improve consistency in direct heat zones, or reduce manufacturing complexity. Without an engineer in the room, we can only speculate but it’s rarely a decision made lightly. Still, I understand how that feels like a step backwards if you’re accustomed to the older setup.

On the materials front, the shift from cast aluminum cookboxes to stainless steel has not happened so I’m not sure what you’re referring to with this topic.

The broader issue of perceived “cheapening” of components is, unfortunately, not unique to Weber. It’s a trend that’s been happening across many consumer product categories. Globalization, rising material costs, and shifting consumer expectations have driven companies to find efficiencies, sometimes at the expense of the qualities that longtime users remember and value. While it doesn’t excuse the loss in quality, it does help explain it.

I know it’s especially hard when a brand you’ve supported for decades seems to move in a direction that feels foreign or disconnected from its roots. But I also think there’s room for hope because many companies do eventually recalibrate based on loyal customer feedback. Sometimes it’s not about abandoning ship, but rather continuing to advocate for the standards that made you a fan in the first place. Your voice matters, and when it’s delivered with the thoughtfulness and detail you’ve provided here, it has a better chance of being heard.

Thanks again for sharing your experience and concerns. Your post is a good reminder of why these products matter to people, and why customer feedback, especially from long-term users, is so important.

All that being said, the good news is, you can always easily snatch up something like a Silver B from FBM for anywhere between $0-$50 and rebuild it to be like new. Then you’ll have all the features you’re looking for.
 
There are many supporters of the old burner orientation, mostly those who rotisserie. Having had both a Silver B for 20 years and now the same size Spirit with the new orientation plus the sear station, I must say that in nearly every respect, the new orientation is superior. It heats more evenly and there is much more versatility, especially when you use the sear burner. I agree that the construction is a little thinner in the cook box, but after 4 years, I have had no problems and no rust on the frame. Mine still has the crossover ignition which I believe should never have been dropped. Manufacturers need to cut costs to be competitive and often drop features we desire, like the tank scale on the new Spirits. They did, in the other hand, make improvements to the burner orientation and sear feature. It all comes down to how it performs and Weber has always been at the top in performance. Hopefully, it stays that way.
 
I think simply put, if Weber were still to operate all operations in the US and staff call centers with knowledgeable, well-informed people the cost of their entry level spirit would easily be double.

I have learned to love my N/S burner 330. I’m sure rotisserie isn’t ideal on that orientation but that’s when I’ll fire up the SSP.

At 41, I have loved Weber grills for 35 years because I used to stare up in awe at an original Ranch that hung from the ceiling of my grandparents house (where I now live). Seeing the decline in quality is frustrating - no doubt. But seeing what’s coming on their latest offerings has given me hope that they are paying some attention to their heritage. But from a bean counter standpoint selling someone a grill for $800 - 25 years ago that they’re still using and is finally giving away to time and the elements, isn’t selling more grills. I think their goal now (and I don’t think it’s ridiculous), is to sell a product that would give 10ish years of quality service.
 
Yes, it's easy to get mad at Weber and many other companies for how they do business now and the products they put out. I get aggravated too, but let's look at your situation. You have a twenty something year old grill that you would like to replace with another one. The grill certainly doesn't owe you anything at this point so you can't be mad about that. You don't like Weber's current grill line up because the burners are north and south, and I don't like that either. Out of spite you say you will buy another brand, except every other brand makes their grills with the same configuration. I recently upgraded my personal grill to a really nice Genesis Gold C that I picked up used obviously and I'm very happy with it. To me it was just like getting a brand new one, except I only payed $50 for it. I would just forget about the new ones as I have and look for a suitable replacement on the used market. Regardless of where you live, they are out there if you keep your eyes open.
 
Out of spite you say you will buy another brand, except every other brand makes their grills with the same configuration
Except Ninja. And of course there are grills out there like Napoleon which give you arguably quite a bit more for the $$$ by installing an IR searing burner to one side and an IR rotisserie burner to spin your food with and all for many times the same or less than Weber. And now you look at some other brands i.e. Monument who is coming on strong and is giving you those features as well. Bottom line it doesn't have to be "for spite" there are better choices for some folks needs who want a product that does what they want it do and don't buy simply because of the name on the lid
 
I'm loving the passion here! The early Weber gassers were trailblazers and yes, we love em but they were and are not perfect. I cannot
honestly believe that the newer burner orientation makes spinning a bird inferior as the burners are are topped with flavoriser bars.

The north/south certainly gives better options for two zone cooking. My first car had a crank handle to start it, now we have a pesky
push button ignition! The f@@king liberty!!
 
I'm loving the passion here! The early Weber gassers were trailblazers and yes, we love em but they were and are not perfect. I cannot
honestly believe that the newer burner orientation makes spinning a bird inferior as the burners are are topped with flavoriser bars.

The north/south certainly gives better options for two zone cooking. My first car had a crank handle to start it, now we have a pesky
push button ignition! The f@@king liberty!!
I bought my Summit with the promise it would do just as well as my Genesis. Then I tried it. Wrong! In comparison it was awful. Thankfully I discovered how badly it performed before I sold it. The beauty of the original design was you could get high but indirect heat across the entire area of your food. Not just the ends. And believe me after spending all that $$$ for the Summit I REALLY wanted it to work well. But, it doesn't. There are other things the new arrangement cannot do nearly as well as the old but spinning is the biggest. The old design was IMO WAY better at doing whole slabs of ribs because the Genesis was too shallow to orient an entire full slab between the burners. So with the old design I could put in a rib rack, stand them up and do enough ribs to feed an army without over cooking the ends or cutting them down.
They only did it to make production cheaper not to improve it. At least it's my take after living with both layouts for MANY years
 
Except Ninja. And of course there are grills out there like Napoleon which give you arguably quite a bit more for the $$$ by installing an IR searing burner to one side and an IR rotisserie burner to spin your food with and all for many times the same or less than Weber. And now you look at some other brands i.e. Monument who is coming on strong and is giving you those features as well. Bottom line it doesn't have to be "for spite" there are better choices for some folks needs who want a product that does what they want it do and don't buy simply because of the name on the lid
Well said Larry, it's definitely good to get the perspective of someone who isn't really a die hard Weber guy as well.
 
I bought my Summit with the promise it would do just as well as my Genesis. Then I tried it. Wrong! In comparison it was awful. Thankfully I discovered how badly it performed before I sold it. The beauty of the original design was you could get high but indirect heat across the entire area of your food. Not just the ends. And believe me after spending all that $$$ for the Summit I REALLY wanted it to work well. But, it doesn't. There are other things the new arrangement cannot do nearly as well as the old but spinning is the biggest. The old design was IMO WAY better at doing whole slabs of ribs because the Genesis was too shallow to orient an entire full slab between the burners. So with the old design I could put in a rib rack, stand them up and do enough ribs to feed an army without over cooking the ends or cutting them down.
They only did it to make production cheaper not to improve it. At least it's my take after living with both layouts for MANY years
Larry, not expecting it to do rotisserie, I LOVE that Summit you sold me! I think it is a powerful cooking machine and now that the disappointing firebox design has been overcome with stainless reinforcements, a superbly built grill. As I have said before, probably the best Weber put their name on.

IMG_1586.jpeg

That said, I have to admit I really liked the Indigo Genesis II that I only had one opportunity to cook on. Was it built like the 1st generation Summit I bought from you? No, but while not as robust, it was still a nice grill with a flexible grilling capability, although, again, rotisserie wouldn’t be it’s best application.

IMG_7622.jpeg
IMG_7627.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7910.jpeg
    IMG_7910.jpeg
    125.8 KB · Views: 0
Larry, not expecting it to do rotisserie, I LOVE that Summit you sold me! I think it is a powerful cooking machine and now that the disappointing firebox design has been overcome with stainless reinforcements, a superbly built grill. As I have said before, probably the best Weber put their name on.

View attachment 116827

That said, I have to admit I really liked the Indigo Genesis II that I only had one opportunity to cook on. Was it built like the 1st generation Summit I bought from you? No, but while not as robust, it was still a nice grill with a flexible grilling capability, although, again, rotisserie wouldn’t be it’s best application.

View attachment 116834
View attachment 116835
Oh yeah Jon it was a powerful and robust cooking machine for me. I really wanted it to do rotisserie as well because at the time my wife was pretty insistent on not having more than one grill.....................................I guess I showed her :D
 
My first Gasser was a brand new 2001 Genesis Silver B ($500), with ‘Home Depot exclusive’ porcelain-coated cast iron grates. Parts wore out and were replaced, Weber Support was outstanding, and the food came out great. I passed that grill on to one of my kids after three overhauls and it’s still going strong.
Comparatively equal in size, my 2020 Weber Spirit 2 ($449) does everything the old grill did, parts have been replaced, Weber support once again has been outstanding and the food comes out great.
 

 

Back
Top