One other thing to consider is that the CyberQ is water resistant and the Stoker is not.
That being said, I have owned a Stoker for almost 3 years and if it failed tomorrow I'd be on the phone with Rock's BBQ purchasing another ASAP. First off I feel the 10 CFM fan is overkill for smaller smokers regardless of which unit you choose, I easily run my Stumps clone, cooking chamber size is 24 x 24 x 36, with a 4 CFM fan. I purchased the 10 CFM fan and it is sitting in my garage as it is total overkill for my cooker, if you're in the Pittsburgh area I'll sell it to you for $75 you pick it up. Being able to remotely access the Stoker has made my life much much easier. I can go to my kids activities and monitor the cook from my cell phone. If the food is done I can turn down the temperature from wherever I am. I've also started cooking pork butts a little differently. I'll cook them at 220 until they are done then crank the temp between 275 and 300 when they are done to add a little more bark. Whenever I cook food for work people hover around my desk to check on lunch as well. Everybody laughs at me but they still come around all morning long to see how lunch is coming along. If you even remotely interested, (pun intended), in controlling your cook from afar the Stoker is the only choice. If you are sure you'll never ever have a need or desire to remotely control cooker it comes down to cost vs. features.
Good luck in your decision.