Originally posted by Michael Atwell:
I am a new WSM owner and had my first smoke this weekend (butt and ribs). Any way, I went to my local barbecue store to purchase some wood chunks and the salesman there was swearing lump was far better. I was telling him about my WSM and Kingsford charcoal and he pretty much said Kingsford is processed garbage and will leave a funny tatse with the food. I thought alot of people on this forum used kingsford charcoal because of burn times etc. I am reading these posts and I am starting to think otherwise. Does the majority use lump or charcoal with their WSM? Can someone shed some light on my confusion? I do wish to produce the best tasting product with my new smoker. However, I am lazy and do not want to baby sit a fire all day either. By the way the salesman also owned a big green egg and swears that is a better smoker than th WSM. Point is his opinions may be biased!!! thanks for your input