Rick Kramer
TVWBB All-Star
Hello friends,
So far, irregardless of what cooker I'm using, I've always cooked my briskets under a pork butt or shoulder. Inevitably, the brisket sells out much faster than the pork. (decent brisket is hard to find around here) What happens is I end up with a bunch of extra pork left over. No problem really because I can freeze it if I need to. BUT ... what can I expect if I choose not to put a butt over my brisket? I know it can be done with great success because I've seen many a cooker with only one level of cooking space and they can't place anything over their briskets yet they still get a good product. I guess what I'm wondering is, how much of an effect will not using a butt over the brisket have on my final results? Is there anything I should do differently to offset the lack of a butt in there? I hope this makes sense because I could sure use some of your opinions and advice.
Thanks, Rick
So far, irregardless of what cooker I'm using, I've always cooked my briskets under a pork butt or shoulder. Inevitably, the brisket sells out much faster than the pork. (decent brisket is hard to find around here) What happens is I end up with a bunch of extra pork left over. No problem really because I can freeze it if I need to. BUT ... what can I expect if I choose not to put a butt over my brisket? I know it can be done with great success because I've seen many a cooker with only one level of cooking space and they can't place anything over their briskets yet they still get a good product. I guess what I'm wondering is, how much of an effect will not using a butt over the brisket have on my final results? Is there anything I should do differently to offset the lack of a butt in there? I hope this makes sense because I could sure use some of your opinions and advice.
Thanks, Rick