I know a lot of people claim the 22WSM is a charcoal hog and the 18 more "efficient"
So if you use the smaller charcoal ring in the 22, do you actually realize the savings in charcoal, is it truly more efficient, or does the extra volume of the 22 negate any "efficiency"?
It seems to me, you'll just run out of charcoal faster with a smaller ring.
Anyone that has tried it both ways?
So if you use the smaller charcoal ring in the 22, do you actually realize the savings in charcoal, is it truly more efficient, or does the extra volume of the 22 negate any "efficiency"?
It seems to me, you'll just run out of charcoal faster with a smaller ring.
Anyone that has tried it both ways?