The Virtual Weber Bulletin Board - An online community for Weber grill owners & fans
    The Virtual Weber Bulletin Board  Hop To Forum Categories  Weber Q Grills    Weber Q Model Comparison Chart
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Weber Q Model Comparison Chart
 Login/Join
 
TVWBB Fan
Picture of Kent Perry
Posted
Has anyone done the work to break down the differences between the various Weber Q models - I mean the gas version, not the charcoal and electric ones. What is the difference between a Q1xx, a Q2xx and a Q3xx? and between a Qx00 and a Qx20?

Inquiring minds want to know!

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Chris Allingham,


I didn't rise to the top of the food chain just to eat vegetables.
 
Posts: 165 | Location: Georgetown, TX | Registered: September 05, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
The Weber US website has all the specs, but the Australian website seems to have a better summary of all the Qs.

The only thing is I don't think the 'E' and 'P' versions are available in the US.

-Mark.


WSM • Performer • Master Touch Gold • Q320 • SJS • Go Anywhere
 
Posts: 227 | Location: Atlanta -> Finland | Registered: June 12, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Wizard
Posted Hide Post
Without going to the spec sites, I believe the difference between the 1, 2 and 3 series is the size (the Char Q is the same size as the 200 series - I don't know about the electric model - I think it is smaller - the same size as the 100 series). The x20 versus the x00 is, I believe, that the x20 series come with thermometers built in.

I'll check out the Australian site - wish we could get all the stuff here that some Weber customers overseas are able to get - especially the colors.

Pat


PFSmith
WSMs, OTS & G, Performer, Q 220, Char Q, SJP, Genesis Silver B - general Weber apologist - a Kamado Joe, couple BGE's, Vermont Castings Gasser and a Traeger Pellet Pooper

"Grilling is a religious experience; smoking is a spiritual retreat."
 
Posts: 1715 | Location: Birmingham, Alabama | Registered: September 01, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
I just put all of the US Q specs in a table:



March-2-2010
Updated table with pictures and BTU/Square inch

June-29-2010
Side tables optional for Q100

-Mark.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Mark R-S,


WSM • Performer • Master Touch Gold • Q320 • SJS • Go Anywhere
 
Posts: 227 | Location: Atlanta -> Finland | Registered: June 12, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
Thanks Mark,

But shouldn't the 20lb LP tank be listed as 'optional' on the Q100, Q120, Q200, Q220?


(In chronological order) : WSM (DO), Green Stainless Performer (DA), Q 220, Q 200. Blue Stainless Performer (EI)
Email in my profile, substitute periods for <DOT>
 
Posts: 200 | Location: Silicon Valley, CA | Registered: January 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
quote:
But shouldn't the 20lb LP tank be listed as 'optional' on the Q100, Q120, Q200, Q220?


Thanks, Jon. I agree with you - The same thing occurred to me just after I posted. I'll update the table.

-Mark.


WSM • Performer • Master Touch Gold • Q320 • SJS • Go Anywhere
 
Posts: 227 | Location: Atlanta -> Finland | Registered: June 12, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
Table updated.

-Mark.


WSM • Performer • Master Touch Gold • Q320 • SJS • Go Anywhere
 
Posts: 227 | Location: Atlanta -> Finland | Registered: June 12, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
Thanks the table is very helpful for anyone looking into which Q to get.


(In chronological order) : WSM (DO), Green Stainless Performer (DA), Q 220, Q 200. Blue Stainless Performer (EI)
Email in my profile, substitute periods for <DOT>
 
Posts: 200 | Location: Silicon Valley, CA | Registered: January 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
The CharQ is the same size as the 200 series and has a two piece grate.


WSM 18.5, Weber 22.5 OTS, Weber CharQ
 
Posts: 159 | Location: Bloomington, Indiana | Registered: August 14, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Picture of Kent Perry
Posted Hide Post
Mark,

This table is fantastic. Thank you.

My back of the envelope calculations:

Q1xx is slightly larger than a Smokey Joe in cooking size

Q2xx is about the size of an 18.5 cooker

Q3xx is about the size of a 22.5 cook surface.

quote:
Originally posted by Mark R-S:
I just put all of the US Q specs in a table:



-Mark.


I didn't rise to the top of the food chain just to eat vegetables.
 
Posts: 165 | Location: Georgetown, TX | Registered: September 05, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
I just updated the table in the original post to include pictures and BTU/square inch.

It's excellent to hear that the table will be useful. I make tables for everything. When I had to choose a company car I made a table to compare 600 models Eeker

If there's any interest I could do the same for the Genesis and Spirit series.

-Mark.


WSM • Performer • Master Touch Gold • Q320 • SJS • Go Anywhere
 
Posts: 227 | Location: Atlanta -> Finland | Registered: June 12, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Wizard
Picture of JRPfeff
Posted Hide Post
Nice work Mark.

I found side tables for my Q-100 at the Weber site. You may want to add this as an "optional" feature.

Jim


****************
Gotta go. AAAAHHHH!
 
Posts: 1577 | Location: Pewaukee, WI & Buckeye, AZ | Registered: September 17, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JRPfeff:
Nice work Mark.

I found side tables for my Q-100 at the Weber site. You may want to add this as an "optional" feature.

Jim


Thanks, Jim. I just updated the table.

-Mark.


WSM • Performer • Master Touch Gold • Q320 • SJS • Go Anywhere
 
Posts: 227 | Location: Atlanta -> Finland | Registered: June 12, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Super Fan
Posted Hide Post
I was looking on the Weber site ! And according to there site the Q 300 has a smaller cooking area than the Q 320 ? Going by the above chart there the same EXCEPT for the igniter one the Q 300 is a piezo and the Q320 is battery opperated ! Am I missing somthing here ? Confused
 
Posts: 474 | Location: S E Michigan | Registered: May 21, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
The 320 includes a warming rack, whereas the 300 doesn't - It can be purchased as an accessory for the 300.

The difference in cooking areas must be due to Weber counting the area of the warming rack for the 320. I'll add this info to the table.

The only differences betweek the Q300 and Q320 are that the 320 has electronic ignition, a warming rack, and a light on the handle. If there isn't much difference in price I'd go for the 320 (actually, I do have a 320!).

-Mark.


WSM • Performer • Master Touch Gold • Q320 • SJS • Go Anywhere
 
Posts: 227 | Location: Atlanta -> Finland | Registered: June 12, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Would the weight of the portables be useful...?

Couldn't find that information on the weber site...


James Goddard
Kanagawa, Japan
 
Posts: 15 | Location: Sagamihara, Kanagawa prefecture, Japan | Registered: May 16, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jim Goddard:
Would the weight of the portables be useful...?

Couldn't find that information on the weber site...


That's a good question, and would be good to know for the portables. I checked a couple of Weber's internatonal sites and didn't find this information (they sometimes have more/different information on different regional sites).

Perhaps somebody who owns a Q100/120/200/220 could weigh it and then I can add the information to the chart.

-Mark.


WSM • Performer • Master Touch Gold • Q320 • SJS • Go Anywhere
 
Posts: 227 | Location: Atlanta -> Finland | Registered: June 12, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Super Fan
Posted Hide Post
I think some sites like Amazon give the shipping weight vs the actual weight .
 
Posts: 474 | Location: S E Michigan | Registered: May 21, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
Hi,

I contacted Weber about the weights, and this is the reply I received:

Thank you for your e-mail. The Q100 weighs 29.2lbs, the Q120 weighs 30.6lbs, the Q200 weighs 42.1lbs and the Q220 weighs 45.1lbs. I will also recommend to my superiors that this information be added to our website.

I'll add this information to the chart.

-Mark.


WSM • Performer • Master Touch Gold • Q320 • SJS • Go Anywhere
 
Posts: 227 | Location: Atlanta -> Finland | Registered: June 12, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
Thanks guys. The info herein is a great resource. I have been thinking about a Q model to add some variety to my growing Weber collection (WSM 18, Kettle 26, SJS)


Question:
I have noticed two different Q220 models available, Weber 566001 Q220 and Weber 566002 Q220. Anyone have ideas on functional differences between the two? I found them at different prices (the -002 model is about $40 more) so I am curious about what the differences could be.
 
Posts: 119 | Location: Palatine, IL | Registered: March 10, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

    The Virtual Weber Bulletin Board  Hop To Forum Categories  Weber Q Grills    Weber Q Model Comparison Chart

© 1997-2012 Chris A. Allingham LLC
The Virtual Weber Bullet is an unofficial Weber product fan site and is not affiliated with Weber-Stephen Products LLC.